Legal Opinion

In Re Hicks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1933No. 23353PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOullison, J.

The respondent, H. A. Hicks, stands charged with conduct unbecoming a lawyer, and the Board of Governors recommended his disbarment.

The record in this case discloses that respondent has been married and has six children. That at the time of the acts complained of herein he was divorced. That respondent became intimate with one Minnie Taylor, a dwarf, who was an unmarried female, of some 28 years of age, weighing about 69 pounds, and possessing the intellect of a child. That by reason of respondent’s intimacy with the said Minnie Taylor, she became pregnant.

The question for our determination…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moore v. StricklingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re MonaghanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  2. R. J. Edwards, Inc. v. HertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  3. Muniz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Searcy v. State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoothSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API