Legal Opinion

Wiper v. Fawkes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 2005No. 16-02-04255; A120407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants, assigning error to the trial court’s conclusion that a tender of a corporate check was a valid tender of money under plaintiffs contract with defendants. Plaintiff argues that the check was not a valid tender because the contract required payment to be made in lawful money or tender of the United States. Defendants cross-appeal the trial court’s denial of their request for attorney fees. We affirm on appeal and reverse on cross-appeal.

We state the relevant facts. Defendant Max-Viz, Inc. (Max-Viz) needed a short-term loan, and plaintiff agreed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bembridge v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Lumbermen's v. Dakota VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Holladay v. HolladayOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Crandon Capital Partners v. ShelkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Lilly Court LLC v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API