Wiper v. Fawkes
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants, assigning error to the trial court’s conclusion that a tender of a corporate check was a valid tender of money under plaintiffs contract with defendants. Plaintiff argues that the check was not a valid tender because the contract required payment to be made in lawful money or tender of the United States. Defendants cross-appeal the trial court’s denial of their request for attorney fees. We affirm on appeal and reverse on cross-appeal.
We state the relevant facts. Defendant Max-Viz, Inc. (Max-Viz) needed a short-term loan, and plaintiff agreed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Bembridge v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Lumbermen's v. Dakota VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Holladay v. HolladayOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Crandon Capital Partners v. ShelkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Lilly Court LLC v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005