Legal Opinion
McKeown v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 28, 2004No. 03-C-528-CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CRABB, District Judge.
This is a civil action for monetary and injunctive relief. Plaintiff James McKeown contends that defendants Trans Union LLC, Factual Data, Inc., Equifax Inc. d/b/a Equifax Information Services, LLC, CSC Credit Services, Inc. and Sears Roebuck & Co. are hable to him for (1) violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act; (2) credit defamation; and (3) tortious interference with credit expectancy. In addition plaintiff asserts that defendant Sears is liable for invading his privacy. Now before the court are four separate motions for summary judgment filed by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Greg and Mary Henson v. Csc Credit Services, Trans Union Corporation, and Cosco Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Renie Guimond v. Trans Union Credit Information CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- James R. Philbin, Jr. v. Trans Union Corporation Trw Credentials James Philbin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Jennifer Cushman v. Trans Union CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Scheel-Baggs v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- Morris v. Trans Union LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- White v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Gohman v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Centuori v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.