Kansas City-Leavenworth Railroad v. Langley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Leavenworth district court; James H. Gillpatrick, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Cunningham, J. :
Defendant in error moves to dismiss this proceeding for the. reason that no legal case-made is attached to the petition in error.
It seems that after chapter 380 of the Laws of 1903 took effect an extension of time within which to make and serve a case-made was obtained by the plaintiff in error, but that such order was not filed with the clerk of the district court as provided in that chapter, and it is claimed that the requirement so to file is mandatory, and a failure to do so renders further proceedings in the matter of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Jones v. State ex rel. AtherbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
- Berry v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Consolidated Traction Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Valin v. Milwaukee & Northern RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schoof v. ByrdSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- St. Louis. S. F. R. Co. v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- McCallion v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- New York Lubricating Oil Co. v. PuseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.