In Re Daniel for the Establishment of Cartway
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment affirming the St. Louis County Board of Commissioners’ decision to grant Daniel’s petition for a cartway over appellant’s land. Appellant argues that lake-only access is sufficient access within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 164.08, subd. 2(a) (2000), and Daniel’s petition for a cartway should have been denied. Because lake-only access is not sufficient access within the meaning of the statute, we affirm.
FACTS
In 1995, Thomas Daniel bought lakefront acreage on Lake Vermillion. Appellant Donald…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Fabio v. BellomoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re RollinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re DanielSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003