Legal Opinion

Usina Costa Pinto S.A. Acucar E Alcool v. Louis Dreyfus Sugar Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 16, 1996No. 93 Civ. 2302 (SAS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:

Defendant Louis Dreyfus Sugar Company, Inc. (“LDSC”) moves for summary judgment asserting that the issues presented in the claim filed by Usina Costa Pinto S.A. Acucar e Aleool and Usina Santa Barbara S.A. Acu-car e Aleool have already been decided. Alternatively, Defendant seeks an order compelling arbitration of the issues raised and/or staying the matter pending arbitration. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motions are granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Parties and Negotiations

Plaintiffs are Brazilian sugar mills. Mr.…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ray Legal Consulting Group v. GrayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Corporate Food Management, Inc. v. Suffolk Community College (In Re Corporate Food Management, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
  4. Fonseca v. Columbia Gas Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
  5. State ex rel. United Asphalt Suppliers, Inc. v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API