Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 31, 2000No. 3:97CV01413PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. # 74]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
In this action involving indemnity under reinsurance policies, Plaintiff Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford) moves for summary judgment .claiming that Columbia Casualty Company (Columbia) is collaterally estopped from litigating any of its defenses based on the arbitration decision resolving Hartford’s claims under two other reinsurance policies, issued by Continental, another of its reinsur-ers, on the same claim. In the alternative, Hartford moves for summary judgment contending there exists…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Donald Binder v. Long Island Lighting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. American Re-Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Allstate Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE COMPANY v. Swiss Reinsurance America Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- North River Insurance v. ACE American Reinsurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.