Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Polsky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1981No. 98 and 186; 80-3-681PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, the defendant, Robert Polsky, was convicted of murder of the third degree and possession of an instrument of crime. On direct appeal to this Court, a violation of the speedy trial requirement of Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(a)(2) was asserted, whereupon the case was remanded for a hearing to develop a factual record sufficient to determine the Rule 1100 claim. Commonwealth v. Polsky, 485 Pa. 360, 402 A.2d 1003 (1979). The instant appeal follows the grant, on remand, of a motion for arrest of judgment and dismissal of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. MillhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. PolskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. BrowneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. ColonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API