Commonwealth v. Polsky
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
A jury found appellant Robert Polsky guilty of murder of the third degree and possession of an instrument of crime. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia denied appellant’s written post-verdict motions and sentenced appellant. On these appeals, appellant renews his claim under Pa.R. *362Crim.Proc. 1100(a)(2) that charges against him should have been dismissed with prejudice. Factual issues necessary to resolution of appellant’s claim have not been resolved. We therefore remand the proceedings for a new hearing.1
On August 7, 1975, a complaint charging…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. KrallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. KovacsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SudlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. PolskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. WebbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FugarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. PolskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.