Brindley v. Krizsan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Steuer, J. (dissenting).
The issue in this action for a declaratory judgment is which of the two defendants will be required to meet and defend plaintiff’s claim. Plaintiff alleges injuries resulting from being struck by an automobile owned by defendant Krizsan and insured by defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company. These defendants claim that at the time of the accident the automobile was being operated by an unauthorized person. If that is the fact, plaintiff cannot proceed to a Successful conclusion against the insured but may against the other defendant, MVAIC. So much is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Piwowarski v. CornwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Jackson v. Brown & Kleinhenz, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Woodland v. CoteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Aarons v. Standard Varnish WorksNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Bennett v. NazzaroNew York Supreme Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.