Legal Opinion

Piwowarski v. Cornwell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

The infant plaintiff was injured in a collision with an automobile owned by defendant Cornwell and driven by defendant Gallup. A verdict was rendered for plaintiff but the judgment was reversed on the law and the complaint was dismissed. If an issue of fact is present, the judgment at Trial Term should not have been reversed on the law.

The parties stipulated on the trial that defendant Cornwell was the owner of the car and that its operation at the time of the collision was negligent. Without objection, the trial justice stated the sole question to be whether at the time of the injury to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Hull v. . LittauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. St. Andrassy v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Orlando v. Pioneer Barber Towel Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Nee v. SlobodaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Leotta v. PlessingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Swensson v. New York, Albany Despatch Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Country-Wide Insurance v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2006

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API