Legal Opinion
Aarons v. Standard Varnish Works
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
These actions were brought to recover by reason of the personal injuries of two infants who were run into while playing on the sidewalk by an automobile belonging to the defendant Standard Varnish Works. The plaintiffs discontinued against the defendant Steinbock and were nonsuited as to the defendant Schwartz. Steinbock was driving the auto at the time of the accident. Schwartz was a salesman for Standard Varnish Works which had placed the auto in his custody for use in his work. The cases were submitted to the jury upon the principle that the ownership of the automobile by Standard Varnish…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Piwowarski v. CornwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Taylor v. United States Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- In re the Application for Letters of Administration de Bonis Non on the Goods, Chattels & Credits of MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Devitt v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- White v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Rutherford v. Gray Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Brindley v. KrizsanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Christie v. B. F. Vineburg, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Rutherford v. Gray Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.