Legal Opinion

Tyer v. Cole

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 13, 1926No. 16736PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.-

Defendant presents his argument for reversal of the judgment under three propositions, as follows:

“(1) Is the default judgment rendered against the; Michorn Oil Company conclusive against this defendant as to the correctness of the amount claimed by plaintiff?
“ (2) That plaintiff’s original action against tlie oil company, being to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien, an exhaustion of the assets of that company impressed wich the lien is a prerequisite to plaintiff’s right to maintain the instant action.
“ (3) That there is no legal authority for including in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Assets Realization Co. v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Price Et Ux. v. Citizens State Bank of MediapolisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Richmond v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Martin v. HostetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Steger Lumber Co. v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tipton v. Standard Installment Finance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Paschal Inv. Co. v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Keaton v. ShiflettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. McDaniel v. BeltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API