Legal Opinion
Tyer v. Cole
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 13, 1926No. 16736PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LOGSDON, C.-
Defendant presents his argument for reversal of the judgment under three propositions, as follows:
“(1) Is the default judgment rendered against the; Michorn Oil Company conclusive against this defendant as to the correctness of the amount claimed by plaintiff?
“ (2) That plaintiff’s original action against tlie oil company, being to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien, an exhaustion of the assets of that company impressed wich the lien is a prerequisite to plaintiff’s right to maintain the instant action.
“ (3) That there is no legal authority for including in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Assets Realization Co. v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Price Et Ux. v. Citizens State Bank of MediapolisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Richmond v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Martin v. HostetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Steger Lumber Co. v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moses v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Tipton v. Standard Installment Finance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Paschal Inv. Co. v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Keaton v. ShiflettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- McDaniel v. BeltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932