Legal Opinion
Keaton v. Shiflett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 10, 1936No. 25816PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, C. J.
This action concerns the individual liability of defendants as stockholders of a corporation for debts due to mechanics, workmen, and labor employed by such corporation after an execution against the corporation was returned not. satisfied, pursuant to section 5463, C. O. S. 1921 (sec. 9913, O. S. 1931).
On January 29, 1931, A. P. Jetton et al., defendants in error, copartners and comprising the members of an independent casing crew, filed suit in the district court of Okfuskee county to recover judgment against the Betty Ann Oil Company, and also against J. B. Keaton and C. D. Gold, who were…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hancock National Bank v. FarnumSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. KendallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Ball v. ReeseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keaton v. JettonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Keaton v. LallathinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Keaton v. McClainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936