Legal Opinion

In Re Richardson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2000No. 98-SP-594PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

T. Carlton Richardson, respondent, was suspended on an interim basis from the District of Columbia Bar following his resignation from the Florida Bar due to pending disciplinary proceedings in Florida. See In re Richardson, No. 95-BG-639 (D.C. June 27, 1995). On April 17, 1997, this court imposed final discipline by suspending respondent from practicing law in the District of Columbia for three years with reinstatement conditioned on proof of fitness. See In re Richardson, 692 A.2d 427, 428 (D.C.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1118, 118 S.Ct. 1056, 140 L.Ed.2d 118 (1998).…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. PaynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Frank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. BouknightSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Baker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. In Re WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In Re SchoenemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Darius Winston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API