Legal Opinion
Pagan v. Gonzalez
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 17, 2009No. AC 28841PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The pro se plaintiff, William Pagan,1 appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Osvaldo Gonzalez,2 an attorney admitted pro hac vice to the bar of the state of Connecticut for the purpose of representing the plaintiff in an underlying criminal matter.3 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the motion for summary judgment with respect to whether (1) the action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations, General Statutes § 52-577, and (2) the plaintiff was required to present expert witness…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Cogswell v. American Transit InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Paul v. GordonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. PaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grimm v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Byrne v. GrassoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Double G.G. Leasing, LLC v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Bozelko v. PapastavrosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Grimm v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.