Legal Opinion
Grimm v. Fox
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 10, 2012No. SC 18814Published
1Opinion of the Court
33 A.3d 205 (2012)
303 Conn. 322
Robert GRIMM
v.
John Wayne FOX, et al.
No. 18814.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Argued September 20, 2011.
Decided January 10, 2012.
Robert Grimm, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).
Frederick L. Murolo, with whom was Karen T. Murolo, Cheshire, for the appellees (defendants).
ROGERS, C.J., and NORCOTT, PALMER, ZARELLA, McLACHLAN and VERTEFEUILLE, Js.
NORCOTT, J.
The plaintiff, Robert Grimm, appeals[1] from the trial court's grant of a motion for judgment in favor of the defendants, John Wayne Fox and Curtis, Brinckerhoff and Barrett, P.C., in this legal malpractice action.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Barnes v. SchleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.