State v. Pagan
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
This appeal arises from the judgment rendered when the trial court denied the motion to correct an illegal sentence filed by the pro se defendant, William Pagan.2 The basis of the defendant’s motion to correct is the representation made by the prosecutor at sentencing as to the amount of heroin in the defendant’s possession, which the defendant claims was inaccurate. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court violated his state and federal constitutional rights to due process by denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence and (2) the prosecutor was guilty of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Andrew Burrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- State v. WatermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- New England Custom Concrete, LLC v. CarboneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.