Legal Opinion

Altieri v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 23, 1969No. C.D. 3906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FoRd, Judge:

The cases listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The merchandise covered by said cases consists of various parts for Allis-Chalmers tractors designated as HD-5, HD-6, HD-9, HD-11 and Caterpillar D-6. The collector of customs at San Juan, Puerto Rico, classified said parts under the provisions of paragraph 372, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, as parts of machines, not specially provided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. United States v. Ducommun Hardware Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Richardson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. United States v. IrwinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. United States v. Lewis & CongerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. William H. Masson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API