Legal Opinion

Burr v. Keene

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1963No. 5169PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The major question presented by both appeals is whether someone other than the owner of the real estate may petition for a special exception under the Keene zoning ordinances.

RSA 31:66 provides that the local legislative body shall provide for the appointment of a board of adjustment and pursuant to the authority of the statute “shall provide that the said board may, in appropriate cases and subject to appropriate conditions and safeguards, make special exceptions to the terms of the ordinance in harmony with its general purpose and intent . . . . ”

Pursuant to the enabling act RSA 31:60-89…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carson v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Shulman v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Richards v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Taco Bell v. City of MissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Martin Marietta v. Board of Leavenworth CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API