Legal Opinion

Vanover v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1996No. Civil 960002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

Edward D. Vanover has appealed a district court amended judgment for $250 in his suit against Kansas City Life Insurance Company (Kansas City) and James B. Slusher, its associate general counsel. Kansas City and Slusher cross-appealed the amended judgment and the trial court’s order denying their motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., or, alternatively, for a new trial under Rule 59, N.D.R.Civ.P. We modify the judgment and affirm.

Vanover was a general agent for Kansas City and for Armour Life Insurance Company (Armour), a subsidiary of Kansas…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rickbeil v. Grafton Deaconess HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Julian Toney v. Wcco Television, Midwest Cable and Satellite, Inc., Also Known as Wcco Tv, Channel 4, Also Known as Iowcco Tv, Channel 411Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Hopkins v. McBaneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dewey v. LetzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Forster v. West Dakota Veterinary Clinic, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ingalls v. Paul Revere Life Ins. GroupNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Grey Bear v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Bjorneby v. Nodak Mutual Insurance CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Bertsch v. DuemelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API