Legal Opinion

Bjorneby v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Company

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2016No. 20150255PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[If 1] Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (“Nodak Mutual”) and Bryan Hurst (together referred to as “Nodak”) appeal from the district court’s denial’ of their motion for judgment as a matter of law and their alternative motion for a new trial. We affirm.

I

[¶2] The Bjornebys are farmers. They insured their farming operation with a Nodak Mutual insurance policy. Hurst was their insurance agent. During potato harvest, a fire started in the break room of the Bjornebys’- potato washing facility. The fire spread and caused substantial damage. The Bjornebys filed an insurance claim, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wilson v. General Motors Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carroll v. CarrollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Jalbert v. Eagle Rigid Spans, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Davis v. Mercy Medical CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Lenertz v. City of Minot N.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API