Bjorneby v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Company
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[If 1] Nodak Mutual Insurance Company (“Nodak Mutual”) and Bryan Hurst (together referred to as “Nodak”) appeal from the district court’s denial’ of their motion for judgment as a matter of law and their alternative motion for a new trial. We affirm.
I
[¶2] The Bjornebys are farmers. They insured their farming operation with a Nodak Mutual insurance policy. Hurst was their insurance agent. During potato harvest, a fire started in the break room of the Bjornebys’- potato washing facility. The fire spread and caused substantial damage. The Bjornebys filed an insurance claim, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Wilson v. General Motors Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carroll v. CarrollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Twete v. MullinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Jalbert v. Eagle Rigid Spans, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Davis v. Mercy Medical CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Lenertz v. City of Minot N.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.