Legal Opinion

State v. Bausman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 1, 1972PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

The defendant, in a trial to the jury, was convicted of having narcotic drugs under his control in violation of §§ 8 and 37 (a) of Public Act No. 555 of 1967, now §§ 19-452 and 19-481 (a) of the General Statutes (Rev. to 1968). The defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict was denied by the trial court and from the judgment rendered thereon the defendant has appealed to this court.

The defendant assigns error in several rulings made by the trial court. In order to pass on these rulings a brief resume of the evidence presented by the state and by the defendant is necessary. On May 15, 1968,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. MarquezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  3. DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  5. State v. GrimesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. State v. GabrielSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. State v. BrigandiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API