Legal Opinion
Mullins v. Henderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1946No. Civ. 12944PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate to be directed to various officers of the city and county of San Francisco requiring them to comply with the terms of a series of three proclamations issued by the mayor of San Francisco in the exercise of the emergency powers conferred upon him by section 25 of the city charter, which so far as here involved reads: "In case of a public emergency involving or threatening the lives, property or welfare of the citizens, or the property of the city and county, the mayor shall have the power, and it shall be his duty, to summon,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Bellus v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798 v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Verreos v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Ruane v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.