Legal Opinion
Lumpkin v. Jordan
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 2, 1996No. A069828PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHAMPLIN, J. *
Reverend Eugene Lumpkin, Jr. (Reverend Lumpkin) appeals after Mayor Frank Jordan (Mayor Jordan) and the City and County of San Francisco (the City) successfully demurred to his complaint. The trial court concluded that the issues raised by Reverend Lumpkin’s complaint had been fully litigated in a prior federal action involving the same parties and, therefore, that Reverend Lumpkin was collaterally estopped from relitigating them. Reverend Lumpkin contends that the record fails to establish that the identical issues were necessarily decided in the prior federal action. He…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Flait v. North American Watch Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Children's Hospital & Medical Center v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Application Group, Inc. v. Hunter Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Roos v. RedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Acuña v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.