Legal Opinion

In Re Forfeiture of $234,200

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1996No. Docket 173498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents an issue of first impression in this state: Does an heir of a decedent or the personal representative of the decedent’s estate, which includes personal property that was seized under MCL 333.7521; MSA 14.15(7521) after the decedent’s death, have standing to assert an innocent owner defense against the in rem forfeiture? We answer this question in the affirmative.

i

Michael Tufnell was killed on August 8, 1993; he was unmarried, had no children surviving him, and died intestate. Claimants Weller and Dorothy Tufnell, as Michael’s parents, were his sole heirs. On September 14,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Palenkas v. Beaumont HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re Forfeiture of $53Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hay v. HayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People Ex Rel. Foreman v. Estate of KawaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Forfeiture of a Quantity of MarijuanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. United States v. Four Hundred Seventy Seven (477) FirearmsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  3. Gerald Ostipow v. William FederspielCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API