In Re Forfeiture of $234,200
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
This case presents an issue of first impression in this state: Does an heir of a decedent or the personal representative of the decedent’s estate, which includes personal property that was seized under MCL 333.7521; MSA 14.15(7521) after the decedent’s death, have standing to assert an innocent owner defense against the in rem forfeiture? We answer this question in the affirmative.
i
Michael Tufnell was killed on August 8, 1993; he was unmarried, had no children surviving him, and died intestate. Claimants Weller and Dorothy Tufnell, as Michael’s parents, were his sole heirs. On September 14,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Palenkas v. Beaumont HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Forfeiture of $53Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Hay v. HayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- People Ex Rel. Foreman v. Estate of KawaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Forfeiture of a Quantity of MarijuanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- United States v. Four Hundred Seventy Seven (477) FirearmsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
- Gerald Ostipow v. William FederspielCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020