Legal Opinion
Hay v. Hay
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 8, 1947No. Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 43,231PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In this case, which was submitted to this Court some months ago but in which additional briefs requested by the Court have been but recently filed, a question of primary importance is presented by appellants in the following words: "Should the will be construed to grant plaintiffs and appellants a vested remainder?" Mr. Justice REID'S opinion answers this question in the affirmative. I am unable to agree in that result.
At the outset it should be noted that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Woodward v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Heard v. ReadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Chapin v. ChapinMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- McCray v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- In re Shumway's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- First National Bank of Kansas City v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- In Re Chapple's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- In Re Jamieson EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re RAYMOND ESTATEMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Edgar EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.