Legal Opinion
F. Giovannozzi & Sons, Inc. v. Luciani
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 17, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, Chief Justice:
The pro-narr averred that the plaintiff below went to the place of business of the defendant for the purpose of purchasing stone; and that while he was walking about the yard of the defendant company he was attacked by a dog owned, under the control of or harbored by the defendant who knew, or had reason to believe, the dog to be a vicious animal.
*213The causes assigned for demurrer were that it nowhere appeared that the defendant violated, or was negligent in, any duty owing to the plaintiff; nor that the dog possessed the specific vicious habit which caused the injury.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Cooke v. Elk Coach Line, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Friedmann v. McGowanSuperior Court of Delaware · 1898
- Wilson v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1939
- Warner v. ChamberlainSuperior Court of Delaware · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Handy v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Richmond Ex Rel. Richmond v. KnowlesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970
- Whitney v. BrannDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Duffy v. GebhartSuperior Court of Delaware · 1960
- Stinson v. Edgemoor Iron Works, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.