Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Brann

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 29, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-11PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATCHUM, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, R. Fiske Whitney, seeks to recover $250,000 from the defendants, who are his daughter and son-in-law, Virginia and Herbert Brann, for personal injuries which he allegedly sustained as a result of an unusual accident involving a horse owned by the defendants.

The separate issue of liability was tried by the Court without a jury on March 26, 1975. After carefully considering the sufficiency and weight of the testimony1 2adduced at trial, the demean- or and relationship of the witnesses who testified and the post trial memoranda filed by the parties, the Court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. McHugh v. BrownSupreme Court of Delaware · 1956
  3. Wagner v. ShanksSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  4. Wilson v. DerricksonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Stratford Apartments, Inc. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Durgah v. MoolenaarSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1985
  2. Arthur v. CummingsSuperior Court of Delaware · 2025
  3. Gerber v. Twitter, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Manniso v. TaylorSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
  5. Smallman v. MGM Resorts InternationalDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API