Legal Opinion

Cooke v. Elk Coach Line, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided September 23, 1935No. 5PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Negligence, in law, involves the conception of a duty to act in a certain way toward others, and a violation of that duty by acting otherwise; so, in every case of actionable negligence, the declaration must disclose clearly the existence of a duty not to subject the plaintiff to the injury complained of, a failure of the defendant to observe that duty, and an injury to the plaintiff resulting proximately therefrom. The allegation of duty is superflous where the stated facts show a legal liability and it is useless where they do not. 6…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Island Express, Inc. v. FrederickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1934
  3. O'Malley v. Laurel Line Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Lewis v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. DresslerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. White v. . ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. McKeon v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  3. Cleveland v. Danville Traction & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  4. Elliott v. CamperSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
  5. Taylor v. Patterson's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API