Cooke v. Elk Coach Line, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
Negligence, in law, involves the conception of a duty to act in a certain way toward others, and a violation of that duty by acting otherwise; so, in every case of actionable negligence, the declaration must disclose clearly the existence of a duty not to subject the plaintiff to the injury complained of, a failure of the defendant to observe that duty, and an injury to the plaintiff resulting proximately therefrom. The allegation of duty is superflous where the stated facts show a legal liability and it is useless where they do not. 6…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Island Express, Inc. v. FrederickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1934
- O'Malley v. Laurel Line Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Lewis v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. DresslerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- White v. . ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- McKeon v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Cleveland v. Danville Traction & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Elliott v. CamperSuperior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Taylor v. Patterson's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.