Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Gebhart

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 20, 1960No. 1004, Civil Action, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christie, J.:

I find as a fact that the dog of Edward D. Gebhart (hereinafter referred to as defendant) bit or scratched the plaintiff Charlotte T. Duffy at about 10 p.m. on August 30,1957. Plaintiff required medical treatment and she has a small permanent facial scar. Defendant’s dog was a male boxer weighing about 75 pounds, and at the time of the incident the dog was about 7 years old. Plaintiff and her mother were out on a suburban road for an evening walk with their leashed collie at the time of the incident.

There was no evidence of any prior viciousness of the boxer. The defendant’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. F. Giovannozzi & Sons, Inc. v. LucianiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1941
  2. State v. TullSuperior Court of Delaware · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler v. FriedenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  2. Handy v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1971
  3. Wells v. WynnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Richmond Ex Rel. Richmond v. KnowlesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1970
  5. Whitney v. BrannDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API