Legal Opinion

State v. Leslie

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 2006No. D0205075M; A123065PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, ORS 166.250, based on defendant’s possession of two handguns that were found concealed, but readily accessible, in a truck in which defendant lived. Defendant contends, in part, that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal based on the “place of residence” exception set out in ORS 166.250(2)(b). We agree with defendant that his truck was his “place of residence” for purposes of ORS 166.250(2)(b). Consequently, we reverse.1

The material facts are undisputed.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Handy v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State of Washington v. Amanda Marie TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State v. Clemente-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API