Legal Opinion

State v. Wolf

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2013No. 1109268CR; A150380PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

The statute that defines “the crime of unlawful possession of a firearm” generally prohibits, among other acts, the carrying of concealed firearms. ORS 166.250(l)(a). The statute also creates exceptions to that general prohibition, including an exception that allows adult citizens to carry concealed handguns in their “place [s] of residence” and “placets] of business” without obtaining a permit or license to do so. ORS 166.250(2)(b).1 In this case, a jury convicted defendant of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm, based on the state’s assertion that defendant had “unlawfully and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. PerryOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. LeslieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Clemente-PerezOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. TeglandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. Clemente-PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. SimonovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API