Southern Pacific Pipe Lines, Inc. v. City of Long Beach
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Defendant, the City of Long Beach, (hereinafter, the City), appeals from a summary judgment granted to plaintiff Southern Pacific Pipe Lines, Inc. (plaintiff) in four consolidated cases. 1 The judgment provided for a refund to plaintiff of portions of the permit fees which the City had assessed plaintiff for the pipelines which plaintiff maintains under the City’s streets. The judgment also directed the City to issue to plaintiff a certain franchise, and it adjudged that the City’s municipal code provisions for permit fee schedules are not applicable to plaintiff, finding in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Santa Cruz v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- First Street Plaza Partners v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Shell California Pipeline Co. v. City of ComptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- City of Los Angeles v. TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO.California Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.