Shell California Pipeline Co. v. City of Compton
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Defendant and appellant City of Compton (the City) appeals the judgment entered following court trial granting plaintiff and respondent Shell California Pipeline Company (SCPC) concurrent, nonexclusive, subsurface pipeline easements for two oil product pipelines that run under the City’s streets.
Because SCPC is a public utility entitled to condemn the instant easements and the evidence adduced at trial supports the trial court’s finding of public interest and necessity for the easements, the judgment is affirmed.
Factual and Procedural Background
1. Historical information.
Shel…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Shell Oil Company, a Delaware Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. City of Santa Monica, a Municipal Corp., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- City of Los Angeles v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- City of Carlsbad v. WightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- City of Hawthorne v. PeeblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- SFPP, L.P. v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Saratoga v. HinzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- San Jose Water Company v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025