Legal Opinion · Dissent

Payne v. Kirkpatrick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1984No. WD 36365Published

1DissentTurnage, Chief Judge

I dissent because I do not believe the circuit court acquired jurisdiction to order the initiative in this case to be placed on the ballot. Although no party has raised the issue of jurisdiction, it is our duty to examine the jurisdiction of the circuit court sua sponte. Justus v. Webb, 634 S.W.2d 567, 568[2] (Mo.App.1982).

The initiative petition in this case was delivered to the Secretary of State on July 5, 1984. The Secretary sent copies of each petition page to local election authorities for them to check the petition signatures against voter registration records. Sometime prior to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Randles v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Blydenburg v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. American Hog Company v. County of ClintonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. LutenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Justus v. WebbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API