Legal Opinion

American Hog Company v. County of Clinton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1973No. KCD 26125PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASSERSTROM, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this declaratory judgment suit for a determination that it has a right to operate its hog-feeding farm as a nonconforming use under the Clinton County Zoning Order and Subdivision Regulations. The defendant County filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to follow the proper statutory procedure, and the County also filed an answer denying the allegations on the basis of which plaintiff claimed a continuing right to a nonconforming use.

The trial court did not rule on the motion to dismiss. However, after hearing evidence, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Planning Board of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. Brogoto v. WigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Cohen v. EnnisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Conoco, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Deffenbaugh Industries, Inc. v. PottsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. C & D Investment Co. v. BestorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Hart v. Bd. of Adj. of City of MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Ross v. Conco Quarry, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API