Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Randell

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Accounting of Lydia W. Randell, as executrix of James Randell, deceased. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

The testator died on the 22d day of December, 1884. His will was admitted to probate January 21,1885. The testator appointed his widow the sole executrix of his will. At the time of his death, and for many years prior thereto, he had been engaged in the retail gents furnishing goods business at Nos. .554 and 556 Eighth avenue, New York city. The executrix on about December 26, 1884, caused an inventory or valuation to be made of the goods and fixtures in this store. This was not a statutory inventory nor has any statutory inventory of the estate of the testator been made at any…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  2. Glen & Hall Manufacturing Co. v. HallCommission of Appeals · 1874
  3. Wood v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Phillips v. . WoosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  5. Columbian Insurance Co. v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of SilkmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. In re Carnegie Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. White Corbin & Co. v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. In re Mullon's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. In re Accounts of Van HoutenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API