Legal Opinion

White Corbin & Co. v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion by the defendant, William Martin Jones, for a new trial upon a case containing exceptions, ordered to be heard at the Appellate Division in the first instance, upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiff for $1,075.12 after a trial at the Monroe Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Spring, J.:

The defendant was a stockholder of the corporation known as the Rochester Lithographing and Printing Company. This company was formed May 10, 1887, and it was the result of the combination of two copartnerships, Willard, Pitt & Moore, and Geobel & Vredenburgh, each of which had been engaged in business in the city of Rochester for some time. The chief part of the $50,000 capital stock of the corporation consisted of the properties of those two companies. The defendant purchased stock in the corporation in February, 1888, to the amount of $6,000, and later, when the corporation was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boon v. . MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Mitchell v. . ReadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of RandellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1889
  4. Beebe v. HatfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Brett v. EbelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Godley v. Crandall & Godley Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Banner Milling Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1921
  4. Brown v. WeeksMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bryan v. Northwest Beverages, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API