Legal Opinion
United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 14, 1995No. Nos. 93-5296, 93-5299PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Appellants petitioned the district court to amend various court orders forfeiting assets of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (1988 & Supp. V 1993). The petitions were dismissed. We affirm on the grounds that appellants’ claims of entitlement to the funds in question are not cognizable under the forfeiture provisions of the RICO Act.
I
In July, 1991, bank regulators in several countries jointly seized and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Healy v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Antonia Campos, Jose Campos, Milk-O-Mat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. Douglas, Jr., Noel Lussier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Charles EmorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Victor Robert Nava, Sr., AKA Big Vic, and Victoria NavaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Dsi Associates LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.