Legal Opinion

First Interstate Bank v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 1995No. WCB 92-16330; CA A82400PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant’s workers’ compensation claim is compensable. We affirm.

The Board adopted the referee’s findings. Claimant is a part-time bank teller. Her duties primarily involve serving customers at the teller window and assisting customers with new accounts, incoming wires and interstate drafts. She is expected to market accounts and to encourage customer involvement in employer’s Community Reinvestment Act program. As part of her duties, she also is encouraged to participate in two community service projects each…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Jordan v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Mellis v. McEWEN, HANNA, GISVOLD, RANKIN & VAN KOTEN, EMPLOYERS, AND MISSION INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. Kiewit Pacific v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Freightliner Corp. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Saif Corp. v. ScardiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. U.S. Bank v. PohrmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. SAIF Corp. v. FortsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Watt v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API