Legal Opinion
Judy Canady v. The Gillette Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 24, 2013No. 13-5326UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERNICE B. DONALD, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Judy Canady appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment on her state-law retaliatory discharge claim in favor of Defendant-Appellee, The Gillette Company (“Gillette”).
Canady originally sued Procter & Gamble, Gillette’s parent company, in Tennessee state court alleging a single claim of retaliatory discharge under Tennessee common law, asserting that Gillette fired her in retaliation for her suffering a “recordable” workplace injury. On March 11, 2011, Procter & Gamble removed the case to the United States…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Artis v. Finishing Brands Holdings, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Teresa Banks v. Argos Risk Management ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Sadler v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Torres v. Precision Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020