Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Amtrak National Railroad
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 20, 1992No. Civ. JH-91-2802PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOSEPH C. HOWARD, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s (Amtrak) motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. Plaintiff Joseph L. Wilson has opposed the motion, and the defendant has replied. With these memoranda, the Court determines the matter is ready for disposition. No hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts as pled by the defendant are as follows. 1 The plaintiff began working for Amtrak in its Track and Maintenance Department in 1977. In 1984, he took an extended leave of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mildred Lee Rogers v. Frito-Lay, Incorporated, Howard L. Moon v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Blizzard v. DaltonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Luttrell v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Vaughan v. AmtrakDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Brace v. Ohio State UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994
- Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.