State Ex Rel. Wall v. Sovinski

The sole question for decision is whether the civil court had authority to vacate and set aside the order of September 14, 1935, which approved the $400 lump-sum settlement.

All of the proceedings purportedly were had in pursuance of the provisions of ch. 166, Stats.

Assuming, but not deciding, that the original judgment entered March 20, 1933, was valid and that it was amended by the order of June 5, 1933 (which judgment and order art not before us), we reach the conclusion from the record before us that the order oí September, 14, 1935, entered by Judge Runge, was null and void because he had…