Legal Opinion
H & Z Vending v. Iowa Department of Inspections & Appeals
Court of Appeals of Iowa
Decided February 24, 1999No. 97-1660PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, S.J.
The petitioner H & Z Vending appeals from the district court ruling on judicial review affirming the respondent’s, Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals, declaratory ruling that petitioner’s video poker game “fraternal poker” is not a lawful game of chance under Iowa Code section 99B.7 (1995).
They contend the Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals’ ruling was contrary to law and the department abused its discretion in refusing to find that their game “fraternal poker” is a lawful game of chance, and that the district court erred in affirming their decision.
Background…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norland v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PflibsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Peters v. Burlington Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Suluki v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Gaffney v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2002
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2002