Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Pflibsen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 13, 1984No. 83-1345PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLE, Justice.

The sole issue we address in this appeal is whether appellee State Farm established its right to summary judgment on a question of policy coverage. The trial court determined from the summary judgment record that State Farm’s policy of automobile liability insurance did not cover the husband of State Farm’s named insured, operating his father’s automobile, when he collided with and injured appellant Dean J. Boeckholt [Boeckholt]. We find that the summary judgment record disclosed genuine issues of fact material to the question of policy coverage. We therefore reverse and remand.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MarrDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Lyon v. WillieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Tasco, Inc. v. WinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  5. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. HinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Meier v. SENECAUT IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. State v. BreuerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Johnston Equipment Corp. of Iowa v. Industrial IndemnitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  4. Lawrence v. GrindeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. State v. SorensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API