Legal Opinion
Girard v. Gill
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided July 24, 1956No. Civ. 915-GPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYES, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have moved for a summary judgment on the basis of the pleadings, the admissions and stipulations and the defendant has also moved for summary judgment.
The plaintiffs, executors of Frank Goldberg and Sadie P. Goldberg, brought this action to recover $21,352.36 with interest from July 22, 1952 which they allege is income taxes exacted of the plaintiffs as additional taxes to those paid under the joint return of Frank Goldberg and Sadie Goldberg for the calendar year 1943. The plaintiffs contend that the tax was not levied or assessed prior to June 30, 1952…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Joyce v. GentschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Guggenheim v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jack M. Lesser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Uinta Livestock Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Girard v. GillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Davis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Morris White Fashions, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.