Legal Opinion

Arthur v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 2009No. 03-CF-1189PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

Appellant, Robert L. Arthur, was indicted for distribution of marijuana and possession with intent to distribute (PWID) marijuana 1 subject to an enhanced penalty in light of appellant’s prior drug conviction for distribution of marijuana. 2 Following a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the distribution charge; he was acquitted on the PWID count but convicted of the lesser-included offense of possession of marijuana. 3 On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by making comments on the likely impact of his testimony on the jury after he had expressed his…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ronnie Payne v. Patricia StansberryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  2. State v. Angelica C. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Conley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Fortune v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API