Legal Opinion

Taylor v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2012No. 11-CT-244PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

Having been instructed that appellant Larry Taylor could be convicted of Operating a Vehicle While Intoxicated (“OWI”)1 if the District of Columbia (the “District”) proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he was impaired by alcohol “in any way or at some level” while operating a motor vehicle, a Superior Court jury found him guilty of that charged offense. The jury was unable, however, to reach a verdict on the additional charge of Driving Under the Influence (“DUI”).2 In this appeal, appellant argues that OWI and DUI are “alternative offenses for the same conduct,”…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. KRISHNA PATRICK MUIR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Reiver v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. Plummer v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Townsend v. Dist. of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Alisha Townsend v. DCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API