Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Davidson

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 27, 2018No. E068344PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER J.

*544Plaintiff, cross-defendant and respondent David Morgan sued Daniel Pena and defendant, cross-complainant and appellant Claudia Davidson for battery. Davidson filed a cross-complaint against Morgan, alleging (1) assault, (2) battery, (3) conversion, and (4) invasion of privacy. The trial court found in favor of Morgan and awarded him $209,000. Davidson raises three issues on appeal. First, Davidson contends substantial evidence does not support the $100,000 punitive damages award. Second, Davidson contends the trial court erred by not permitting her to use a *545deposition transcript when…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Trust Co. v. Vanetik, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Conservatorship of O.B.California Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Conservatorship of O.B.California Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Daneshmand v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Daneshmand v. City of San Juan Capistrano CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API